The Virgin Conception of Christ

Wednesday, December 18, 2024

“Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel” (Isaiah 7:14 KJV).

While Christendom speaks of the “virgin birth of Christ,” according to today’s Scripture, a more accurate term would be the “virgin conception of Christ.” There was nothing unusual about Christ’s birth; it was His conception that was unique because there was no human father!

Interestingly, today’s Scripture has been the point of controversy for over a century (to Satan’s delight!). Some modern Bibles (RSV, NRSV, et al.) translate the Hebrew word here translated “virgin” as the vague “young woman,” thereby leaving room for the heretical idea that Joseph was Jesus’ biological father (and denying Christ’s deity)! If someone ever tells you almah (the Hebrew word translated “virgin”) can mean “young woman” or “virgin,” they are right, but point out that the key to choosing the right translation is not up to a translator, but rather the Holy Ghost!

The author of Matthew’s Gospel, filled with the Holy Ghost, knew which translation—“young woman” or “virgin”—was what God had intended in Isaiah 7:14. If we want to know what God meant in Isaiah 7:14, why not ask God?

“Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, “Behold a virgin shall be with child…” (Matthew 1:22,23a). The Greek word translated “virgin,” parthenos, can only mean “virgin,” not “young woman.” Isaiah was prophesying a virgin, indicated by the words “firstborn son” (Matthew 1:25; Luke 2:7) and “Joseph knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son” (Matthew 1:25). Isaiah 7:14 meant “virgin,” as indicated by Luke 1:34, for Mary “knew not a man.” Again, the Bible is clear that Joseph was not Jesus’ biological father.

Matthew 1:23 indisputably proves that almah in Isaiah 7:14 did not simply mean a “young woman,” who may or may not be sexually pure, but “a virgin,” a woman who never had any sexual intercourse. The Holy Ghost, not Joseph, was the Father of Jesus’ body (Matthew 1:18-20).

For more information, see our archived Bible Q&A: “What is the real Immaculate Conception?

Corn in The King James Bible #3

Thursday, September 26, 2024

At that time Jesus went on the sabbath day through the corn; and his disciples were an hungred, and began to pluck the ears of corn and to eat (Matthew 12:1 KJV).

Is “corn” a “mistranslation” here, as is frequently assumed?

We believers will give account to God, the Lord Jesus, at the Judgment Seat of Christ. “…[F]or we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ. For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God. So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God” (Romans 14:10-12). “Wherefore we labour, that, whether present or absent, we may be accepted of him. For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad” (2 Corinthians 5:9,10).

Christian friend, if at His Judgment Seat the Lord asked you why you believed what you believed and/or why you did what you did, what would be your answer? “My church, my preacher, my professor told me to believe this and do this?” If He inquired why you re-translated your Bible instead of re-reading it, how would you reply? “My church, my preacher, my professor told me the ‘oldest and best manuscripts’ were preferred?” These lame excuses pacify people on Earth today, yet the Lord will not be satisfied to hear them in Heaven.

As the Lord Jesus Christ inspects our soul, doctrine, and work; it will be far better for Him to recognize how we gave it everything we had to learn the truth from His Word rightly divided. We went through so much trouble to give His Bible the benefit of the doubt—despite what skeptics repeatedly told us as they griped about alleged “errors in translation.” The position of faith, trusting God, is always more desirable than trusting fallible men. Far better to believe the Bible than books about the Bible (commentaries, dictionaries, grammars, et cetera). Faith leads us to believe God’s inspired, preserved, infallible Book in English is the King James Bible. It has a lot to teach us about God’s plan for the ages (and our language), but are we too proud to be taught since we are sitting in God’s seat?
















































@font-face
{font-family:”Cambria Math”;
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:roman;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;}@font-face
{font-family:”Bookman Old Style”;
panose-1:2 5 6 4 5 5 5 2 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:roman;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:647 0 0 0 159 0;}@font-face
{font-family:Humanist521BT-Light;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;
mso-font-alt:Cambria;
mso-font-charset:77;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:auto;
mso-font-signature:3 0 0 0 1 0;}@font-face
{font-family:Cambria;
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:roman;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-536870145 1073743103 0 0 415 0;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
margin:0in;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:”Cambria”,serif;
mso-fareast-font-family:Cambria;
mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”;}.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-default-props:yes;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Cambria”,serif;
mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
mso-fareast-font-family:Cambria;
mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
mso-font-kerning:0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}

Corn in The King James Bible #2

Wednesday, September 25, 2024

At that time Jesus went on the sabbath day through the corn; and his disciples were an hungred, and began to pluck the ears of corn and to eat (Matthew 12:1 KJV).

Is “corn” a “mistranslation” here, as is frequently assumed?

In addition to the eight times “corn” appears in its New Testament, the Authorized Version has “corn” some 86 times in its Old Testament (for example, Genesis 27:28,37; Genesis 41:5,35,49,57; Genesis 42:1-3,5,19,25,26; Genesis 43:2; Genesis 44:2; Genesis 45:23; Genesis 47:14; Exodus 22:6; Leviticus 2:14,16; Deuteronomy 7:13; Deuteronomy 11:14; Deuteronomy 12:17; Deuteronomy 33:28; Joshua 5:11,12; Judges 15:5; Ruth 2:2,14; 1 Samuel 17:17; 1 Samuel 25:18; 2 Samuel 17:19,28; 2 Kings 4:42; 2 Kings 18:32; et cetera).

Again, we remind ourselves of one of the plethora of complaints the whiners and disparagers of the King James Bible utter: “How can those translators suggest the Bible characters of northern Africa and the Middle East were familiar with ‘corn,’ a North American crop? Their choice of words is most unfortunate! The term should be rendered ‘grain!’” At this point, the scoffers seemed to have proved our Authorized Version is most inferior, and our translators but country bumpkins who could not distinguish between their continents and foods.

Yet, we must remember that English is a living language—its words and definitions change through time. However, older or classic English is static: it is dead, its terms and meanings fixed, thus far purer than what the Anglophone (English-speaking) world has today. To be sure we keep God’s timeless words intact, far better it would be for us to utilize a so-called “outdated,” “old-fashioned,” “archaic” system. We dare not change our Bible simply because some “scholars,” with limited linguistic capabilities, demand we should.

If we were to take The Oxford English Dictionary, for instance, and look into this authority on the English language, we would find the following entry for “corn:” “the grain of any cereal (edible) crop.” In other words, “corn” is general—though we use it almost exclusively for “maize” (a North American crop also known as “Indian corn”). Technically, wheat, rye, and barley are all types of corn (but they are not maize). See, we do not adjust the Bible to reflect our ignorance; we simply increase our meager understanding of our language….
















































@font-face
{font-family:”Cambria Math”;
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:roman;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;}@font-face
{font-family:”Bookman Old Style”;
panose-1:2 5 6 4 5 5 5 2 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:roman;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:647 0 0 0 159 0;}@font-face
{font-family:Humanist521BT-Light;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;
mso-font-alt:Cambria;
mso-font-charset:77;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:auto;
mso-font-signature:3 0 0 0 1 0;}@font-face
{font-family:Cambria;
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:roman;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-536870145 1073743103 0 0 415 0;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
margin:0in;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:”Cambria”,serif;
mso-fareast-font-family:Cambria;
mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”;}.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-default-props:yes;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Cambria”,serif;
mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
mso-fareast-font-family:Cambria;
mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
mso-font-kerning:0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}

Corn in The King James Bible #1

Tuesday, September 24, 2024

At that time Jesus went on the sabbath day through the corn; and his disciples were an hungred, and began to pluck the ears of corn and to eat (Matthew 12:1 KJV).

Is “corn” a “mistranslation” here, as is frequently assumed?

Our King James Bible has come under such heavy criticism for using the word “corn”—literally on more than one occasion. For instance, look at the New Testament cases.

“At that time Jesus went on the sabbath day through the corn; and his disciples were an hungred, and began to pluck the ears of corn and to eat” (Matthew 12:1). “And it came to pass, that he went through the corn fields on the sabbath day; and his disciples began, as they went, to pluck the ears of corn (Mark 2:23). “For the earth bringeth forth fruit of herself; first the blade, then the ear, after that the full corn in the ear” (Mark 4:28). “And it came to pass on the second sabbath after the first, that he went through the corn fields; and his disciples plucked the ears of corn, and did eat, rubbing them in their hands” (Luke 6:1).

“Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone: but if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit” (John 12:24). “But when Jacob heard that there was corn in Egypt, he sent out our fathers first” (Acts 7:12). “For it is written in the law of Moses, thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen?” (1 Corinthians 9:9). “For the scripture saith, thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn. And, The labourer is worthy of his reward” (1 Timothy 5:18).

The “scholar” points out loudly and clearly, “How could the ancient Jews in the Middle East know of corn?! That is a North American crop that was discovered later! What a King James error!” Is this a valid argument, a mark of spirituality on the critic’s part? Or, is it just another petty, false accusation based on limited information? Dear friends, let us weigh the evidence….
















































@font-face
{font-family:”Cambria Math”;
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:roman;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;}@font-face
{font-family:”Bookman Old Style”;
panose-1:2 5 6 4 5 5 5 2 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:roman;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:647 0 0 0 159 0;}@font-face
{font-family:Humanist521BT-Light;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;
mso-font-alt:Cambria;
mso-font-charset:77;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:auto;
mso-font-signature:3 0 0 0 1 0;}@font-face
{font-family:Cambria;
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:roman;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-536870145 1073743103 0 0 415 0;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
margin:0in;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:”Cambria”,serif;
mso-fareast-font-family:Cambria;
mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”;}.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-default-props:yes;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Cambria”,serif;
mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
mso-fareast-font-family:Cambria;
mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
mso-font-kerning:0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}

Corn in The King James Bible #1 At
that time Jesus went on the sabbath day through the corn; and his disciples
were an hungred, and began to pluck the ears of corn and to eat

(Matthew 12:1 KJV). Is “corn” a “mistranslation”
here, as is frequently assumed? Our King James Bible has come under such
heavy criticism for using the word “corn”—literally on more than one
occasion. For instance, look at the New Testament cases. 
“At that time Jesus went on the sabbath
day through the corn; and his disciples were an hungred, and
began to pluck the ears of corn and to eat”

(Matthew 12:1). “And it came to pass, that he went through the corn
fields on the sabbath day; and his disciples began, as they went, to pluck the
ears of corn
(Mark 2:23). “For the earth bringeth forth
fruit of herself; first the blade, then the ear, after that the full corn
in the ear”
(Mark 4:28). “And it came to pass on the second sabbath
after the first, that he went through the corn fields; and his
disciples plucked the ears of corn, and did eat, rubbing them in
their hands”
(Luke 6:1).
 “Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except
a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone:
but if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit”
(John
12:24). “But when Jacob heard that there was corn in Egypt, he
sent out our fathers first”
(Acts 7:12). “For it is written in the law
of Moses, thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn.
Doth God take care for oxen?”
(1 Corinthians 9:9). “For the scripture
saith, thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn.
And, The labourer is worthy of his reward”
(1 Timothy 5:18).
 The “scholar” points out loudly and
clearly, “How could the ancient Jews in the Middle East know of corn?!
That is a North American crop that was discovered later! What a
King James error!” Is this a valid argument, a mark of spirituality on the critic’s
part? Or, is it just another petty, false accusation based on limited
information? Dear friends, let us weigh the evidence….

No Corrupt Communication #22

Saturday, March 23, 2024

“Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers” (Ephesians 4:29 KJV).

What is this “corrupt communication?”

One spiteful critic stated he rejected our position because we King James Bible users claim to have knowledge with certainty. Echoing a classic humanist (a pagan, in fact), he contended “we can know nothing for certain” (then, Luke 1:4 is untrue?). Strangely, this seminary graduate has a ministry as a “Christian apologist,” someone who allegedly defends Jesus’ teachings against cults (he knows something for certain, apparently)! He is also cognizant his “scholarly” modern-version friends would disown him in a heartbeat if he dare support the King James Bible! “Nevertheless among the chief rulers also many believed on him; but because of the Pharisees they did not confess him, lest they should be put out of the synagogue: For they loved the praise of men more than the praise of God(John 12:42,43). It is these kinds of people “in ministry” we had better watch out for and totally avoid!

If anyone questions your exclusive use of the King James Bible, or complains it has mistakes, then ask them to show you a Bible you can trust 100 percent. They will not present it to you. All they will offer you is another Bible they find fault with as well. This is the corrupt fruit of textual criticism, and we are certain it has poisoned almost every Bible college, minister, local church, “Christian” book, “Christian” sermon, and Christian soul through the centuries. People who have been robbed of an authoritative, perfect Bible now attempt to take it away from us, so we no longer pose a threat to their church, theological system, or seminary indoctrination.

Dear friends, here is the subtlest form of “corrupt communication,” the deadliest type of misinformation, and the costliest kind of education—stunting the growth of billions of church members, producing more heresy and apostasy than atheism, agnosticism, and free-thinking combined. The position of faith is to believe God’s perfectly preserved Word and words in English are the King James Bible. Any other conclusion is doubtful, subject to change, and rank unbelief. Mark it well, and never forget it!

-FINIS!-

No Corrupt Communication #21

Friday, March 22, 2024

“Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers” (Ephesians 4:29 KJV).

What is this “corrupt communication?”

Our 400-year-old King James Bible’s “archaic” (old-fashioned) terminology is criticized ad nauseam. English is indeed a living language: words and definitions are being added and deleted as time passes. It is also a diverse language, borrowing from various other tongues. Hence, English is deteriorating, especially as slang becomes more commonplace. The King James Bible’s English is quite precise, far more representative of the original Bible languages than today’s English, and thus vastly superior to modern English.

Not only was the King James Bible translated when English was at its purest (seventeenth century), study of the original Bible languages (Hebrew, Aramaic, and Koine Greek) was exploding like never before. The Protestant Reformation a century prior had generated much spiritual enlightenment (which the Roman Catholic Church hithertofore had stifled via superstitions and blind reliance on literate priests who misled the illiterate masses). Yea, no man or group of men assembled today could ever come close to producing another King James Bible. What we need to do is be thankful for what those 1611 scholars left us, and stop the petulant whining and juvenile emendations (“poor translation,” “mistranslation,” “the original Greek or Hebrew says…”—such baseless grievances equating to “corrupt communication”).

The professing church, and even the genuine church, finds itself in an unenviable position. Having been so brainwashed to question the King James Bible, it does not give a second thought to retranslation or replacement with a modern version. The Authorized Version is so distrusted in countless minds that they are now vulnerable to teachers, preachers, and professors who have been educated (willingly or inadvertently) by Roman Catholic scholarship that wishes to reverse the Reformation. With Protestants lacking firm faith in their Bible, the traditionalists who worship “scholarship” or manmade systems can then “help.” Allegedly, “Holy Mother Church” and her “informed” servants will give us the real Word of God—not only what it means, but what it is (Codices Vaticanus and Sinaiticus!). This is what Protestant leaders have stimulated by relentlessly attacking their King James Bible, so we dare not dismiss the Bible versions issue as unimportant!

Let us summarize and conclude this devotionals arc….

No Corrupt Communication #20

Thursday, March 21, 2024

“Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers” (Ephesians 4:29 KJV).

What is this “corrupt communication?”

Counselling the elders (church leaders) of Ephesus, the Holy Spirit through the Apostle Paul advised: Take heed [watch out, be careful!] therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood. For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock. Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them. Therefore watch, and remember, that by the space of three years I ceased not to warn every one night and day with tears. And now, brethren, I commend you to God, and to the word of his grace, which is able to build you up, and to give you an inheritance among all them which are sanctified” (Acts 20:28-32).

Not only would the threat be outside the church—it would be inside it too. People in ministry, who once held to the truth, would fall away from it. These are the false teachers of whom we should be especially vigilant. What better way to infiltrate, divide, and thoroughly destroy Christians with heresies than by “Christian” (HA!) leaders adjusting their Bible (what they trust!)?

Some years back, I followed a Bible teacher who habitually corrected the King James Bible. Eventually, I wrote a letter to him explaining his inconsistency: he always said, “Follow the Bible, not what I say,” but he constantly offered a “better translation” when he disliked what the Bible said. He agreed with me that “modern versions were of the Devil,” but he had the right to change Bible verses for the purposes of teaching. Wow! (The modern versions are of the Devil for the same reason his treatment of the King James Bible was of the Devil: both positions take the authority from God’s words and place it on people’s opinions, thus fracturing what the unadulterated truth would have united.)

“Perverse things”—corrupt communication—were spoken and written….

No Corrupt Communication #19

Wednesday, March 20, 2024

“Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers” (Ephesians 4:29 KJV).

What is this “corrupt communication?”

As Bible believers, we recognize a chief malevolent (evil) spirit exists: Satan is not merely an idea, but a spirit-being just as real as God is. “Satan” (Hebrew) means “adversary.” (See it translated “adversary/adversaries” in Numbers 22:22; 1 Samuel 29:4; 2 Samuel 19:22; 1 Kings 5:5; 1 Kings 11:14,23,25. It is rendered “withstand” in Numbers 22:32.)

The first time Satan appears in Scripture is Genesis chapter 3: “[1] Now the serpent was more subtil [sneaky, underhanded] than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? [2] And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: [3] But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. [4] And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: [5] For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.”

In Genesis 3:1, Satan opened by questioning God’s words—“Did God really say this…?” Eve was too confused to know the truth, so she accepted his “enlightenment!” Read God’s original words in Genesis 2:16,17: “And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.” However, in Genesis chapter 3, Eve omitted “freely” from God’s words, added “neither shall ye touch it” to God’s words, and watered down “thou shalt surely die” to become “lest ye die.” Only then did Satan finally deny God’s words altogether: “Ye shall not surely die….”

Satan’s evil world system and its participants, boasting “scholarship” and “expertise,” still incite us to treat God’s words so shamefully, disrespectfully, corruptly….

No Corrupt Communication #18

Tuesday, March 19, 2024

“Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers” (Ephesians 4:29 KJV).

What is this “corrupt communication?”

Read Daniel 7:25: “And he shall speak great words against the most High,….” Go back to Daniel 11:36: “And the king shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods,….” Re-read Revelation 13:5,6: “And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months. And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven.”

As indicated above, the Antichrist (counterfeit Christ or false Messiah) in the ages to come will use his tongue to utter lies. Basically, he will claim to be God in human flesh—and he will command people to worship him as God or face the death penalty (2 Thessalonians 2:3,4; Revelation 13:7-18). The creature is now being worshipped and served as the Creator, the climax of Satan’s policy of evil (Romans 1:25).

People respond to the Antichrist (“the beast”) in Revelation 13:3,4: “And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast. And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?” So thoroughly deceived, they praise the Antichrist, loving and adoring this satanic man who embodies all the Devil purposed (“I will be like the most High;” Isaiah 14:14). Doubtless, as James chapter 3 elucidated, here is man utilizing his tongue most wickedly. An imitation is assumed to be the genuine, and the phony is esteemed in place of the legitimate.

If there will be a counterfeit living Word of God (Antichrist mimicking Jesus Christ), with that sham (Antichrist) receiving Jesus’ rightful glory, it is not inconceivable the written Word of God (Holy Bible) has been imitated and forgeries have been exalted in its place….

No Corrupt Communication #17

Monday, March 18, 2024

“Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers” (Ephesians 4:29 KJV).

What is this “corrupt communication?”

In James chapter 3, we read the following: “[1] My brethren, be not many masters, knowing that we shall receive the greater condemnation. [2] For in many things we offend all. If any man offend not in word, the same is a perfect man, and able also to bridle the whole body. [3] Behold, we put bits in the horses’ mouths, that they may obey us; and we turn about their whole body. [4] Behold also the ships, which though they be so great, and are driven of fierce winds, yet are they turned about with a very small helm, whithersoever the governor listeth.

“[5] Even so the tongue is a little member, and boasteth great things. Behold, how great a matter a little fire kindleth! [6] And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire of hell. [7] For every kind of beasts, and of birds, and of serpents, and of things in the sea, is tamed, and hath been tamed of mankind: [8] But the tongue can no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison.”

The tongue is indeed small—certainly not the size of a limb or torso—yet it exercises a disproportionate amount of power. Tongues throughout history have been used to inflict great damage (gossip, sassing, slander, blasphemy, insults, and so on). In the ages to come, James will be especially appropriate concerning the Antichrist, the man who will “speak marvellous [disrespectful, extraordinary, outrageous] things against the God of gods” (Daniel 11:36). Revelation 13:5,6 amplifies: “And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months. And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven.”

Let us see what people say about this Antichrist….